Sushi Nakazawa

Names Nakazawa as a top pick in answer to the question.

Rates the sushi as excellent and comparable to the other option, with its experience ranked slightly lower.

Enjoyed it, but found it overpriced and not worth the cost.

Went earlier this year and was let down on value; rates its quality below KIYOMI's.

Says eating at Nakazawa made them see that their earlier sushi had been poor.

Points to Nakazawa only as a big splurge, implying it costs a lot.

Recommends Nakazawa for its craft, sake pairing and experience-style dining.

Calls Nakazawa phenomenal and says they and their partner keep wanting to return.

Agrees; went a year or two ago and loved it, though pricey and worth it for a special night.

Suggests keeping Sushi Nakazawa instead, since a tight budget may not suit the other option.

Calls Nakazawa excellent, saying it compares favorably with high-end sushi they've had, including in Japan.

Says Nakazawa's counter lacks the chef engagement found at Barracks Row, so ranks Nakazawa lower.

Says Sushi Nakazawa is the stronger option for its price, and calls it more refined than Ogawa.

Says Nakazawa was great, though they liked the other spot more.

Says sushi fans should try Nakazawa's counter, calling it excellent.

Calls it great, with very high-quality fish, though quite traditional.

Has visited the sushi counter twice; one visit ranked among their most memorable meals ever.

Calls Nakazawa a great choice, but would rank Omakase above it.

Says it is the one obvious choice.

Also endorses Nakazawa's sushi counter, adding to earlier recommendations.

Says they've been and gives it a perfect score.

Found Nakazawa a letdown after having visited Ogawa first.