Armando al Pantheon

Thinks it has declined: very busy with a conveyor-belt feel.

Visited a few months back and says the food was good.

Says many places serve similar pastas and would never return.

Lists Armando as a good option near the Pantheon, grouped with Roscioli as examples of where to go.

Calls this Pantheon restaurant a must-visit with spectacular food.

Says the couple especially loves this place and names it as a Rome favourite.

Calls it great too, though getting a reservation there is harder.

Says it was excellent in earlier years and is still decent now.

Found it mediocre and would not return; thinks it was much better a decade ago.

Advises booking ahead; praises its tripe and suppli.

Says it is terrific traditional Roman cooking, not Michelin-level, and advises keeping a booking.

Underwhelmed; found it acceptable but unremarkable, without standing out.

Thinks it is overrated and prefers another spot.

Says quality holds up, but influencer attention makes booking a table very hard.

Says it's an influencer place that isn't bad, though booking far ahead isn't worthwhile.

Says the place is great and recommends its tripe; the poached pears in wine make a tasty dessert.

Recommends Armando al Pantheon for its amatriciana.

Recent meal was very poor: scrambled carbonara eggs and overcooked pasta; would not recommend.

Calls it amazing but very small, so they book well in advance.

Commenter names it as their top restaurant in the city, located just around the corner from the Pantheon.

Also named as a preferred central option over other city-center places.

Visited a couple of months ago and found the food as excellent as in earlier years; prefers lunch.